Showing posts with label Surname-Lawson (P). Show all posts
Showing posts with label Surname-Lawson (P). Show all posts

Tuesday, February 11, 2025

Am I Related to a Historical Figure? The Joys and Pitfalls of Genealogy

Uncovering Famous Names in the Family Tree: The Joys, Pitfalls, and Unsung Heroes

Image created using OpenAI's Dall-E tool

Researching family history is always an adventure, but nothing sparks curiosity quite like finding a

famous name among our ancestors—whether they’re direct forebears or distant relatives. For me, the thrill of genealogy has led to possible connections to Benjamin Franklin, John Hancock, and a confirmed connection to Daniel Boone through a great-aunt, Zilpha Lawson. While these discoveries are exciting, I’ve also learned that tracing famous relatives comes with both joys and pitfalls—and that the real heart of genealogy lies in the everyday people who paved the way for us.

The Excitement of Finding a Famous Connection

There’s something undeniably thrilling about realizing that a well-known historical figure might be in your family tree. It’s the kind of revelation that makes history feel personal—suddenly, the stories in textbooks aren’t just events of the past but part of your family’s journey. Imagine knowing that a distant uncle helped draft the Declaration of Independence (John Hancock) or that an innovator like Benjamin Franklin shares a branch on your tree. Even with my confirmed link, although through marriage, to Daniel Boone, a man who opened the frontier to settlers, it’s fascinating to think about how these figures shaped the country we live in today.

These discoveries also open the door to a deeper understanding of history. Instead of reading about Franklin’s inventions or Boone’s expeditions from a distance, I can explore how their lives intersected with the places, events, and movements that shaped my own family’s past. This makes history more personal and meaningful.

The Pitfalls: Myths, Assumptions, and the Burden of Proof

Of course, finding a famous name in the family tree isn’t always as simple as it seems. Genealogical myths and mistaken assumptions are everywhere—many families have long-held stories of being related to someone famous, only for deeper research to reveal gaps or misinterpretations. False connections are often repeated in online trees, and the further back you go, the harder it is to separate fact from fiction.

Even if a connection is plausible, proof is everything in genealogy. Without well-documented sources—such as wills, land records, or verified family links—it’s easy to fall into wishful thinking rather than solid research. That’s why I approach my Franklin and Hancock connections with caution—while the links are possible, I want to make sure I follow the right trail, not just an exciting one.

Another challenge is avoiding the trap of focusing only on famous names while overlooking the everyday ancestors who were just as important. It’s easy to get swept up in big discoveries, but every person in a family tree played a role in shaping the next generation, whether they were an explorer, a farmer, a teacher, or a soldier.

The Unsung Heroes: Honoring the Non-Famous Ancestors

Image created using OpenAI's DALL-E tool

For every Daniel Boone, John Hancock, or Benjamin Franklin, there were thousands of lesser-known individuals who worked just as hard to carve out a future. They may not have made it into history books, but they laid the foundations for the generations that followed.

Take Zilpha Lawson, for example. She may not be as well known as her Boone relatives, but her life and marriage to Larkin Barnes helped carry the Boone legacy forward through their children, including James C. Barnes, who moved westward in Texas. Likewise, the Lawsons, who lived and worked on the frontier, played their part in the movement of settlers that shaped the expansion of Missouri.

Even those whose names we barely know—women who raised large families in harsh conditions, men who farmed and built communities, soldiers who fought in wars without recognition—were just as crucial to our story. Without them, there would be no family tree to research, no legacy to uncover.

Final Thoughts: Finding the Balance Between Fame and Family

Discovering famous ancestors or distant relatives can be exhilarating, but genealogy is ultimately about honoring all those who came before us. The thrill of connecting with history through well-known figures like Franklin, Hancock, and Boone is real, but so is the value in uncovering the lives of those who lived in quiet determination, shaping the world for future generations.

If you’re tracing your own family tree and stumble across a notable name, embrace the excitement but follow the evidence. And while doing so, don’t forget the everyday heroes in your lineage—because, in the end, it’s their resilience and hard work that truly brought us here.


Daniel Boone: The Pathfinder of the American Frontier

"Image generated using OpenAI's DALL-E tool."

Few figures in American history embody the spirit of the frontier like Daniel Boone. Born in 1734 in Pennsylvania, Boone became one of the most famous pioneers of early America. He played a crucial role in the westward expansion of the United States, particularly through his exploration and settlement of Kentucky. In 1775, Boone blazed the Wilderness Road through the Cumberland Gap, allowing thousands of settlers to move westward, shaping the course of American history.

Boone’s accomplishments were remarkable, but his journey was not without struggles. As a frontiersman, he faced constant danger from both nature and conflict, particularly with the Shawnee, who resisted the encroachment on their lands. In 1778, he was captured by the Shawnee and adopted into their tribe, only to escape and warn settlers at Boonesborough of an impending attack. Boone also experienced financial hardships, losing much of his land due to legal disputes and poor investments, despite his significant contributions to westward expansion.

In his later years, Boone left Kentucky and moved to Missouri, then part of Spanish-controlled Louisiana, where he was granted land and continued to live as a hunter and explorer. However, even in Missouri, he faced land disputes after the U.S. took control of the territory. He died in 1820 at the age of 85, leaving behind a legacy as one of the most iconic figures in American pioneer history. Over time, books and stories exaggerated some of his adventures, making him a folk hero whose legend grew far beyond his real-life exploits.

Boone’s influence extended beyond his own exploits—his descendants and relatives played important roles in shaping frontier communities. Zilpha Lawson, daughter of Jacob and Mary Lawson, married Larkin Barnes, a descendant of Daniel Boone. Their son, James C. Barnes, eventually moved to Texas, continuing the westward migration pattern that Boone had helped establish decades earlier.

The Boone connection in the Lawson family history is a fascinating reminder of how early American families interwove their legacies through marriage and migration. Just as Boone paved the way for settlement, his descendants and those connected to his lineage, like Zilpha Lawson and her son James C. Barnes, carried forward the pioneer spirit, moving westward in search of new opportunities.

Sources: 

  • Robert Morgan's Boone: A Biography (a book I am reading.)
  • Online sources are available for further research:
    • The Filson Historical Society.
    • Missouri State Archives – Daniel Boone’s Final Years & Land Grants.
    • National Park Service – Cumberland Gap & Boone’s Wilderness Road

Sunday, February 9, 2025

Tracing the Lawson Line: The Children of Jacob and Mary Lawson & the Search for Their Ancestry

 Researching the Lawson family history has been both a rewarding and challenging journey. Jacob and Mary Lawson were early settlers of Missouri, migrating from Tennessee or Kentucky before appearing in Montgomery/Warren County, Missouri, by the early 1830s. They later moved to Pulaski County, Missouri, where Jacob Lawson passed away before December 1845.

"Image generated using OpenAI's DALL-E tool."

The family appears in Phelps County after 1850, although they most likely did not move; the county lines did.

This post will document all known children of Jacob and Mary Lawson, listed in the correct birth order based on Jacob’s probate record. I’ll also share my ongoing search for their ancestry and highlight an interesting side note—one of their daughters, Zilpha Lawson, married into the Boone family, making her a relative by marriage to the legendary Daniel Boone.


The Children of Jacob and Mary Lawson

Through probate records, census data, marriage records, and land transactions, I have identified the following children of Jacob and Mary Lawson. Birth years marked with (c.) are estimates.

1. Zilpha Lawson (c. 1808 – before 1850)

  • Married Larkin Barnes on December 10, 1834, in Warren County, Missouri.
  • Larkin Barnes was a descendant of Daniel Boone, meaning Zilpha’s children carried Boone lineage.
  • By 1850, Zilpha appears to be deceased, as Larkin Barnes and their son James C. Barnes were living in Texas without her.

2. Lavina Lawson (c. 1809 – unknown)

  • Married George W. Williams on October 31, 1833, in Warren County, Missouri.
  • Possibly resided in Charrett, Warren County, Missouri, in 1840.
  • Her later whereabouts are unknown.

3. Matiliday Lawson (c. 1810 – unknown)

  • Possibly married Richard Kenerday.
  • Named in Jacob Lawson’s probate record.

4. Isaac Lawson (b. 1811 – after 1850)

  • Born in Tennessee.
  • Married Jane (maiden name unknown).
  • Lived in Pulaski County, Missouri, working as a farmer.
  • Appears in the 1850 Census in Pulaski County, Missouri, with his wife.

5. Berry Lawson (c. 1813 – before 1855)

  • Died in Pulaski County, Missouri, before 1855.
  • Wife was Sarah or Mary (or they were the same person).
  • Estate was administered by Sarah Lawson.

6. Lewis Lawson (c. 1822 – unknown)

  • Named in Jacob Lawson’s probate record.

7. Martha Lawson (c. 1830 – unknown)

  • Possibly married Jonathan Dell.

8. Delilah Lawson (c. 1832 – before 1870)

  • Married Jackson Brewer.
  • Had two daughters, Mary Ann and Melinda Jane.
  • Died before 1870, and her daughters were raised by her siblings.

9. William Hamilton Lawson (b. March 23, 1833 – after 1877) [My Ancestor]

  • Born in Calloway County, Missouri.
  • Confirmed as Jacob and Mary’s son through probate and land records.
  • Also referred to as Hamilton Lawson ("Ham").
  • Involved in illicit distilling cases (1876-1877); fined $100 and court costs in March 1877.
  • His family was involved in the infamous Lawson-Wade murder trial in the late 1890s in Phelps County, Missouri.

10. Kissiah (Kessiah) Lawson (c. 1838 – unknown)

  • Married Randolph Pruett.
  • Named in Jacob Lawson’s probate record.

11. Mary Ann Lawson (c. 1840 – died before 1850)

  • The youngest child.
  • Named in Jacob Lawson’s probate record.
  • Most likely died before 1850, according to probate and census data.

There may be additional children who have yet to be identified, as early census records indicate more sons and daughters in Jacob Lawson’s household, plus there are gaps in birth years between children.


Searching for the Ancestry of Jacob and Mary Lawson

Now that I have this starting point for the children of Jacob and Mary Lawson, the bigger question remains: Who were Jacob and Mary’s parents, and where did they come from? What was the fate of their descendants?

Here’s what I’ve uncovered so far:

  • Jacob Lawson first appears in Montgomery/Warren County, Missouri, in the early 1830s.
  • Jacob more than likely came from Tennessee but may have been from Kentucky.
  • He was in Pulaski County, Missouri, by 1840, where he owned land and enslaved individuals.
  • He died before December 1845, leaving behind Mary Lawson as his widow.
  • At least one of their children (Isaac) was born in Tennessee, suggesting Jacob and Mary migrated from Tennessee to Missouri.

The Boone Connection (But Not Mine!)

One of the more interesting side discoveries in my research was the connection between the Lawsons and the Boones—but it’s important to note that this does not make me a Boone descendant.

"Image generated using OpenAI's DALL-E tool."

Instead, Zilpha Lawson, the sister of my ancestor William Hamilton Lawson, married Larkin Barnes, a descendant of Daniel Boone.

This connection is fascinating because Daniel Boone’s descendants were heavily involved in early Missouri settlement, especially in St. Charles, Montgomery, and Warren Counties. Many of their families intermarried with other pioneer families, including the Lawsons.

Interestingly, a newspaper article from that time mentions a "Boone rifle," highlighting the prominence of the Boone family in the region.


Next Steps in My Research

I’m continuing my research to answer the big questions:

  • Where did Jacob and Mary Lawson come from before Missouri?
  • Who were their parents?
  • When did Jacob and Mary get married?

My Plan:

  1. Tracking earlier records in Tennessee
    • Could Jacob Lawson have come from a Lawson family in East or Middle Tennessee?
    • Are there connections to North Carolina or Virginia before Tennessee?
  2. Checking tax and land records
    • Examining Missouri tax lists from the 1820s to see when Jacob first appeared in the region.
    • Searching for land purchases and sales that might name his relatives.
  3. DNA Matches
    • Investigating DNA connections to other Lawson families to see if shared ancestors can be identified.

How You Can Help

If you are researching the Lawson family and have any clues, I’d love to compare notes! Feel free to reach out or leave a comment with any insights.

Monday, January 20, 2025

Breathing Life Into the Past: Animating a Family Photo

Family history often comes to us in fragments: stories passed down, documents unearthed, and photos carefully preserved. But what if those still moments could come alive? Thanks to modern technology, we can now do just that. One of my most treasured photos—a family portrait of my great-grandparents, John Franklin Lawson and Nora Mezo, with their three daughters (the one in the center is my grandmother, Bertha Lawson), taken prior to 1920—has been transformed in a way that feels almost magical.

Using the "DeepStory" link on the MyHeritage app, I uploaded the original photo and applied its powerful animation feature. The result? A dynamic rendering that brings their expressions to life, giving the impression that they’ve momentarily stepped out of history to meet us in the present.


The Original Photo

The original image captures John and Nora with their daughters, each displaying the formal and reserved demeanor common in early 20th-century portraiture. It’s a snapshot of a moment frozen in time, filled with subtle details—John’s stern expression, Nora’s gentle gaze, and the delicate poses of their daughters.


The Animation

The animation feature in MyHeritage uses AI technology to enhance and animate still photos. Subtle movements like blinking, turning heads, or soft smiles add a lifelike quality to the people in the image. When I first saw the animated version of this cherished photo, it was as though my ancestors were looking back at me for the first time. It’s an uncanny but deeply moving experience that gives us a glimpse of how they might have appeared in life, beyond the stillness of the original photograph.


Why It Matters

Animating this photo gave me more than just a technical marvel—it created an emotional connection. Seeing John, Nora, and their daughters animated felt like stepping closer to understanding them as real people rather than distant figures in history. It’s a poignant reminder of how far we’ve come in preserving and experiencing family history, blending the past with the present in ways that previous generations could only imagine.


Share the Journey

Below, you’ll find the original photo alongside the animated version. I hope this inspires you to explore new ways of connecting with your own family’s history. If you’ve tried similar tools or have thoughts about using technology in genealogy, I’d love to hear your stories in the comments!



Original Photo:

Animated Photo:



Family history isn’t just about the past—it’s about making those connections feel alive today. And with tools like this, we can truly bring history into the present.




Monday, December 30, 2024

Lawson Murder Trial Background

The Lawson Murder Trial

Why this story matters

It is not hard to imagine the hardships, conflicts, and mysteries that shaped the rural counties of Phelps and Pulaski, Missouri, in the late 19th century. Thirty years after the Civil War—a conflict that not only divided the nation but also left deep scars among the families and communities of these counties—it is likely that lingering tensions brought a sense of unease and division fueled by old wounds and differing allegiances. I have ancestors from these counties who served on both sides of the conflict (but that is another story). By 1896, the tragic death of Frank Wade and the sensational trial of several Lawson family members may have provided both a reprieve from the grind of daily life and a spark for local gossip.

Background

"Image generated using
OpenAI's DALL-E tool."
This tragic case involved the brutal death of 11-year-old Frank Wade, whose body was discovered in a pond with disturbing injuries. The Lawson family, neighbors to the Wades, found themselves at the heart of the accusations, which included allegations of murder, conspiracy, and attempts to conceal the crime. For my family, this case isn’t just a piece of local history—it’s personal, connecting directly to the stories of our ancestors and the lives they lived. It’s a window into their struggles, conflicts, and just life in rural Missouri during that time.

Questions/Comments Welcome

     "Image generated using OpenAI's           
DALL-E tool."

While the facts of the case are compelling, they leave much room for interpretation. The source for most of the narrative was from local newspapers, many of whom assumed the guilt of those charged.  Was the Lawson family responsible for Frank Wade’s tragic death? Were the events as clear-cut as the prosecution alleged, or did bias and circumstantial evidence sway public opinion? I’ve explored this case using historical documents, court records, and newspaper clippings from the time, with some help from modern AI tools to organize and analyze the information.

That said, I’d love to hear what you think! Do you agree with the analysis, or do you see other possibilities in the evidence? If you have additional insights, family stories, or even just your own theories, please share them! This case is as much about piecing together history as it is about keeping our family’s stories alive."

Sources

This analysis was built upon primary sources from historical newspapers, including the Rolla Herald (1896-1897), the St. Louis Republic (July 1897), and other contemporaneous accounts.

Notable references include:

  • Rolla Herald, September 30, 1897: An account of Uncle Ham Lawson’s altercation with a state witness.
  • St. Louis Republic, July 19, 1897: A detailed timeline of Frank Wade’s disappearance and discovery.
  • Gasconade County Republican, August 6, 1897: The acquittal of Martha Lawson and courtroom developments.

Whenever possible, I’ve cited dates and publications to ensure transparency and accuracy. If you’d like copies of any of the referenced articles or transcripts, let me know, and I can share them."

How It Comes Together

I have uploaded most of the newspaper articles and court documents from the Lawson Murder Trial into ChatGPT and tasked the AI with transcribing and creating timelines of events. I verified the accuracy of these results to ensure they align with the original sources.


Let A.I. be the Jury-Lawson Murder Trial

As I am exploring how to use AI in my genealogical research, I decided to pose a different challenge to the AI assistant: I asked the following questions— What is your analysis of the Lawson Murder Trial? Based on the facts provided, were one or all of the Lawsons guilty or innocent? The AI’s conclusion: Probably Guilty!

Please click here if you want a summary of the Trial

Here is the AI’s Response:

Analyzing the Lawson murder trial based on the provided facts reveals a complex case steeped in circumstantial evidence, conflicting accounts, and strong emotions within the community. Here’s a breakdown:

Key Evidence:

  1. Frank Wade’s Murder:
    • Frank Wade’s body was discovered in a pond, with his throat cut from ear to ear, a bruise near one eye, and a gash on his forehead. The crime was brutal and deliberate.
    • The timeline places Frank Wade in the company of Lawson family members immediately before his disappearance and subsequent death.
  2. Witness Testimony:
    • Martin Harris’s Testimony: Harris testified to circumstances implicating the Lawson family, suggesting their involvement in Frank’s death. His testimony appears to have been consistent and uncontradicted, although the defense worked to discredit it.
  3. Circumstantial Actions of the Lawsons:
    • Andy Lawson retrieved a razor and was seen walking toward the hill after strapping it.
    • Andy, Jacob, and Martha Lawson were observed heading up the hill, where Frank was believed to have been injured or unconscious.
    • After Frank’s disappearance, Andy Lawson borrowed a saddle and left town, which raised suspicion in the aftermath of the tragedy.

The Defense’s Case:

  • The defense presented alternate explanations, including the possibility that Frank Wade was accidentally struck with a rock during a quarrel with Rackliff Lawson and John Lawson, with the adults allegedly attempting to conceal the incident.
  • Defense testimonies aimed to create reasonable doubt about Andy, Jacob, and Martha’s direct involvement.

Jury Decisions:

  • Andy Lawson’s first trial resulted in a hung jury.
  • Martha Lawson was acquitted despite evidence pointing to her involvement.
  • Rackliff Lawson’s charges were dropped due to insufficient evidence.

Analysis: The Case Against the Lawsons:

  • The timeline, witness testimony, and circumstantial evidence strongly suggest that members of the Lawson family likely played a role in Frank Wade’s murder.
  • Andy Lawson’s behavior—retrieving the razor, leaving town after the murder, and his potential influence over the younger Lawson boys—casts significant suspicion.
  • The razor’s presence and the deep cut across Frank’s throat point to the involvement of an adult, rather than a child.

Weaknesses in the Case:

  • Lack of Direct Evidence: No one witnessed the murder itself. The case relied on circumstantial evidence and testimony, leaving room for reasonable doubt.
  • Alternative Theories: The defense’s claim that Frank was accidentally killed by the younger boys in a fight and the adults concealed the body cannot be conclusively disproven.
  • Community Bias: The longstanding feud between the Wades and Lawsons may have influenced public opinion and heightened the eagerness to assign guilt.

Judicial Outcomes:

  • The acquittal of Martha Lawson and the lack of conclusive verdicts for Andy and Jacob Lawson reflect the difficulty in proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • The jury’s quick deliberation in Martha’s trial suggests that factors such as her age, gender, or societal perceptions may have influenced the outcome, rather than the strength of the evidence.

Conclusion:

Based on the facts provided, it seems highly probable that at least one member of the Lawson family (most plausibly Andy or Martha Lawson) was involved in Frank Wade’s murder or the concealment of his body. However, the exact chain of events remains unclear. The evidence—though strongly suggestive—fell short of irrefutable proof, allowing the Lawsons to avoid definitive convictions.

This ambiguity is what makes the Lawson murder trial such a compelling historical mystery. Suspicion looms heavily, but the inability to definitively prove guilt has left it unresolved in the annals of history.

Acknowledgment for AI Contribution:

"This analysis of the Lawson Murder Trial was provided with the assistance of ChatGPT, an AI-powered assistant developed by OpenAI. The AI synthesized information based on historical records and detailed timelines from the 1896–1897 trial to provide an impartial perspective on the case."

 


"The Razor’s Edge: Death in Phelps County" (Lawson Murder Trial update)

Genealogical Research and Artificial Intelligence (A.I.)

How can A.I. help with genealogical research.  I will be exploring how A.I. can assist and derail family history research as I learn more about this technology. I will attempt to use some of this blog to reveal my discoveries.  In the meantime I am going to provide an update to the Lawson Murder Trial that took place in Rolla, Missouri (Phelps County) between 1896-1897.  This time, I was assisted by A.I. and added a little "flair" to the story.  

I will be posting more about this trial and more about how this story came about in another post (hopefully soon.)  Please refer to an earlier post I made on this on January 31, 2019 (Lawson Murder Trial: 1896-1897) for a reference to some of the facts in this version of the story.

"The following story is a fun yet informative account of the Lawson Murder Trial of 1896-1897, which took place in Rolla, Missouri (Phelps County). I enlisted the help of AI technology to transcribe old newspaper articles and create a chronological timeline based on historical accounts and court records I uncovered. I also gave the AI writing assistant permission to add a touch of fiction to the story for historical flavor and imagination. These fictional elements are marked in italics so they can be distinguished from historical facts. As I continue to uncover more details from other sources, this story may evolve. For now, it stands as a fascinating glimpse into an intriguing chapter of my family’s history, which I’m excited to share with you."

"The Razor’s Edge: Death in Phelps County"

It was a sweltering July morning in 1896 when Frank Wade, a bright-eyed eleven-year-old, disappeared from the bucolic countryside of Spring Creek Township in Phelps County, Missouri. The hills, usually peaceful with the sounds of cicadas and the occasional neigh of a horse, seemed to hold their breath that day. The rolling farmland, dotted with patches of dense woodland, stood witness to a crime that would send shockwaves through the quiet community and pit neighbor against neighbor.

The day began innocuously enough. William Wade, Frank’s father, sent his two youngest boys, Frank and Millard, aged fourteen, to visit the home of Hamilton Lawson. The Lawson family—a large, tight-knit group with a reputation for trouble—lived about two miles from the Wade farm. Hamilton, a patriarch in his sixties, presided over a clan that included his son Andy, Andy’s eleven-year-old boy Rackliff ("Rack"), and several other family members. The boys, eager to escape the chores of midsummer farm life, carried their lunches in small tin pails and skipped along the dusty road that meandered through the valley.

Frank and Millard arrived at the Lawson property between 8 and 9 a.m. They were greeted by Hamilton’s grandson, John Lawson, aged fifteen. The boys, restless with energy, quickly fell into rough-housing and exploring the nearby stable yard, where chickens scattered and the scent of fresh hay mixed with the damp earth. It wasn’t long before John suggested they head over to Andy Lawson’s house to fetch Rack. Reluctantly, Frank agreed to make the short trip alone. Moments later, Frank returned with Rack in tow, followed briefly by Andy himself, who soon left without explanation.

The morning unfolded lazily as the four boys roamed through the woods surrounding the Lawson property. They climbed trees, hunted frogs near a small creek, and threw stones at an old log balanced precariously across the water. But as the sun reached its zenith, casting shadows long and foreboding, a subtle shift occurred. Little Rack and Frank slipped away from the group and headed into a nearby vacant field.

Lunch was called an hour later by Martha Lawson, the matriarch of the family, who ruled her household with a stern hand. A meal of cornbread, fried chicken, and boiled potatoes awaited the boys, but when the group assembled, Frank was missing. Rack returned to the table last, looking suspiciously flushed. When pressed about Frank’s whereabouts, he shrugged, claiming that Frank had wandered off over the hill, singing and laughing. Johnny Lawson, unusually pale and restless, excused himself from the meal, muttering about feeling ill.

It was Andy Lawson who raised the most eyebrows that afternoon. Emerging from the house with a razor in hand, he paused on the front porch to "strap" the blade against a leather strop. The metallic whisper of steel on leather carried eerily across the yard, leaving those present with an inexplicable unease. Without a word, Andy pocketed the razor and disappeared up the hill with his mother, Martha, and his brother, Jacob, following close behind.

By the time Millard Wade returned home later that day, dusk had settled over the valley, and the oppressive heat had given way to a humid stillness. Frank was nowhere to be found. Alarmed, Mr. and Mrs. Wade, along with Millard and his older brother Devers, retraced the boy’s steps back to the Lawson property. Their search extended into the night, joined by neighbors armed with lanterns and a sense of foreboding. Andy Lawson, however, did not participate. Instead, he was seen the next morning riding a borrowed horse toward Pulaski County, where he claimed to have "business."

Two days later, the grim discovery was made. The clear water pond behind the Lawson house had been searched before, but it wasn’t until Tuesday afternoon that the lifeless body of Frank Wade was found floating face-up. He was naked, his throat cut from ear to ear, and a deep gash marred his forehead. The left side of his face was swollen and bruised. The small community was stunned. The brutality of the crime—so cold and calculated—seemed inconceivable in their quiet corner of Missouri.

The Coroner’s inquest quickly turned its focus to the Lawson family. Witness testimony painted a damning picture: Rack’s evasive answers, Johnny’s sudden illness, and Andy’s suspicious departure all pointed toward foul play. A lynch mob began to form, but cooler heads prevailed, and Andy and Rack were taken under guard to the jail in Rolla. There, they awaited their fate as rumors swirled and theories multiplied.

By the time the September Grand Jury convened, three indictments for first-degree murder had been returned: one against Andy Lawson, one against Rackliff Lawson, and one against Jacob Lawson. At the March 1897 term of the Circuit Court, the charges against Rack were dropped, but Andy stood trial. The evidence was largely circumstantial—the razor, the timing, the behavior of the suspects—but it was enough to hold the community in thrall.

In the courtroom, the prosecutor’s voice rang out as he painted a vivid picture of the crime, accusing Andy Lawson of orchestrating a "horrible and inhuman butchery." Witnesses spoke of the bitter animosity between the Wades and the Lawsons, tracing its roots to an old feud involving a shooting years before.

Despite the drama, the jury remained unconvinced. After hours of deliberation, they failed to reach a verdict. The trial ended in a hung jury, and Andy was remanded back to jail. But the case was far from over.

In the months that followed, the body of Frank Wade was exhumed for further examination, and the focus shifted to Martha Lawson. The prosecution alleged that she had taken the razor from her son Andy and delivered the fatal cut herself. When her trial commenced in July 1897, the courtroom buzzed with anticipation. But the evidence—already tenuous—failed to convict. Martha Lawson was acquitted, and with her exoneration, the case against the Lawson family began to unravel.

By the end of that summer, the Lawsons returned to their farm, their reputation irreparably tarnished but their lives spared. The murder of Frank Wade faded into local legend, an unsolved mystery that left scars on the tight-knit community. To this day, the shadow of that bright Sabbath morning in 1896 lingers over the hills of Phelps and Pulaski counties, a chilling reminder of the darkness that can hide even in the most peaceful of places.

The End?

"This story was developed with the assistance of AI technology, specifically ChatGPT, which contributed factual research, writing support, and creative storytelling elements based on historical records. The AI played a key role in organizing and crafting the narrative under my guidance, while striving to maintain historical accuracy wherever possible."  "The illustrations accompanying this story were created using Craiyon, an AI-based tool that generates images from textual descriptions. These images are not historical but are intended to evoke the time period and setting of the events."


Thursday, February 7, 2019

Lawson Murder Trial-The Defense

Finding a good lawyer to defend someone accused of murder may be difficult to find in some cases since the lawyer knows they may be defending someone who did the crime.  Defending someone who may be guilty of murder, especially murder of a child would require someone who is dedicated to the "fair trial" concept and to the idea that the burden is on the prosecution to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.

In case of the Lawson trial-in which they all were acquitted, the defense was made up of some interesting characters who had their own issues.  I'm posting some articles about each and letting these articles speak for themselves,

First up is...




Next up is 




Finally, The Ugly man William C. Kelly




Thursday, January 31, 2019

Lawson Murder Trial: 1896-1897

My grandfather, Roy Peterson married Bertha Ellen Lawson in Texas County, Missouri.  Bertha
Lawson was the daughter of JOHN FRANKLIN LAWSON and Nora Mezo.  The Lawson family wasn't originally from Texas County, Missouri, but were from the neighboring counties of Phelps and Pulaski.

In late 1896 to early 1897, John Lawson (mentioned above) was in the middle of a murder trial where his mother and uncles were accused of murdering one of John's playmates.

To help follow the names mentioned in the tale, refer to the family on the right.
  • William Hamilton Lawson (called "Hamilton" or "Ham" Lawson)
  • Martha Alexander Lawson
  • Jacob Lawson (called Jake)
  • Andrew Lawson (called Andy)
  • Rack Lawson (son of Andrew Lawson)

The details of the murder and trial was reported by the Rolla Herald (Rolla, Phelps County, Missouri) over a two year period.





1896

6 Aug. 1896:  A Brutal Murder:  An 11-year-old Boy's Throat Cut and His Body Thrown in a Pond.


     The neighborhood about midway between Relfe and Spring Creek, in the southwestern part of Phelps county was greatly excited last Tuesday when the body of little 11-year-old Frank Wade, son of William Wade, was found in a small pond about 250 yards from the home of Hamilton Lawson, a neighbor, lacerated, nude and cold in death.  The throat was cut from ear to ear.
     Frank Wade and an older brother went to Ham. Lawson's on the Sunday before to play with the Lawson boys.  Frank then went to Andy Lawson's to get his son Rack, aged about 10 years, to come over and play with them.  This was in the morning.  Rack and Frank after a time left the other boys and went into an old thrown-out pasture.  When called to dinner all put in an appearance but Frank Wade.  Rack Lawson, on being questioned, said Frank had gone up the ravine singing and laughing.
     After Rack had eaten his dinner he stayed around Hamilton Lawson's until about 4 o'clock, when he went home with his father.  Frank Wade was never again seen alive.
     When Rack returned home to supper he still claimed that Frank had gone up the ravine singing and laughing, or at least his mother says he did.
     Frank's older brother on reaching home that evening was surprised in not finding him there and the parents became greatly worried and gave the alarm.
     Searching parties were formed among the neighbors-and everybody volunteered to search but
Missouri County Plat Maps, 1930
Source: Missouri Digital Heritage
Andy Lawson, father of Rack.  Rack did not take much interest in the matter one way or the other.  On Tuesday evening the body was found as above stated.
     A coroner's inquest was held by Squire J. N. Vance, assisted by Prosecuting Attorney Thos. M. Jones, of Rolla.  The details were closely inquired into, and the jury returned a verdict holding Andrew Lawson and his son, Rack, responsible for the murder.
     The prisoners were brought in Thursday night by deputy sheriff John McMasters, constable John Brown and a posse of eight men, and placed in the jail in this city.  The feelings against the accused were at a high tension, and for a time all that was needed for a lynching was a hot-headed leader.  The rope was already on the ground, but better judgment prevailed.
     A report has reached here that very early Monday morning Andrew Lawson borrowed a saddle from a neighbor and rode over into Pulaski county and bought a pair of pants and shoes for himself, when he could get the same things at Pillman's store or at Relfe, only a mile or two away.
    The clothing belonging to the murdered boy have not as yet been found.


My Personal thoughts about the report given above:  It looks like the paper reported the facts (that were known) but also added a little flavor.  For example, "Rack did not take much interest in the matter one way or the other."  This sounds like something someone voiced and the paper ran with it.  The paragraph about Andrew Lawson riding over to Pulaski County didn't seem relevant.  The neighborhood borders Pulaski County to the West-Spring Creek is actually closer to the Pulaski County border than it is to Relfe (see map.)











11 Nov. 1896:  Jail Cost

The following piece of information comes from the Rolla Herald (Phelps Co., MO.)  Andy and Rack Lawson were arrested back in August of 1896 for the murder of Frank Wade.  I am trying to imagine what jail might have been like for a 10 year old boy in 1896.


26 Nov. 1896 (Rolla Herald):  Indictment for Father & Son


10 Dec. 1896:  Trial Time

The State had four months to prepare the case to this point.



19 Dec. 1896 (Rolla New Era):  A close call?


26 Dec. 1896, (Rolla New Era):  Off to St. Louis


This article gives us some details that we didn't have before.  Andy Lawson is being charged with concealing the body and Rack Lawson (age 10) is being charged with murder.


Here are a couple of images of the Phelps County Jail.  https://dnr.mo.gov/shpo/nps-nr/90000766.pdf gives a lot of details about the history of the Phelps County Jail (application for National Register of Historical Places.)
Phelps County Jail,
https://dnr.mo.gov/shpo/nps-nr/90000766.pdf